🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy could be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," said one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this international debate unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that states globally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.